Kostenlos Prime Bullshit Jobs: A Theory (Hörbuch-Herunterladen): Amazon.de: David Graeber, Christopher Ragland, Simon & Schuster Audio: Audible AudiobooksAutor David Graeber – Avengersinfinitywarfullmovie.de

Worst book I ve read in 2018 should know better than trust an academic anthropologist to teach me anything about the industry The subject is interesting, but the author has little idea what he s talking about and lots of ideology.Evidence is anecdotal at best individual emails or, unbelievably, posts from internet fora where anyone can pose as anything The BS job definition underpinning the book it s BS if the person having the job believes it to be is pure strategic genius, as it deflects all critique Unfortunately, it s methodologically ridiculous in all its naive relativism The obvious ramifications are left entirely unaddressed CEOs, bankers, military BS job examples the author uses do not acknowledge their job as such engineers and SW developers, instead, often fall over each other to do that Annoyingly, I m also a hands on engineer so are my half a dozen colleagues who read the book The figures all two of them are a joke still unsure what Figure 1 supposedly shows, but it s neither trend two datapoints, one year apart nor that 50% of work is BS unless emails, good and bad meetings, admin tasks and are BS anyone with teamwork experience can disprove that Equally annoying are the straw men the authors insists on knocking down Douglas Adams s hairdressers , as well as his abysmal ignorance of e.g SW industrial SW means duct taping together open source SW for real Again, should know better than have an anthropologist lecture me about SW.All in all, a waste of time and money if you re a trained scientist engineer or simply partial about substantiated claims If you insist on wasting the former, I ll save you the latter by sending you my copy lightly annotated before giving up Even better, just read Graeber s original essay the book adds nothing to it anyhow. From best selling writer David Graeber, a powerful argument against the rise of meaningless, unfulfilling jobs and their consequences Does your job make a meaningful contribution to the world In the spring of , David Graeber asked this question in a playful, provocative essay titled On the Phenomenon of Bullshit Jobs It went viral After a million online views indifferent languages, people all over the world are still debating the answer There are millions of people HR consultants, communication coordinators, telemarketing researchers, corporate lawyers whose jobs are useless, and, tragically, they know it These people are caught in bullshit jobs Graeber explores one of society s most vexing and deeply felt concerns, indicting among other villains a particular strain of finance capitalism that betrays ideals shared by thinkers ranging from Keynes to Lincoln Bullshit Jobs gives individuals, corporations, and societies permission to undergo a shift in values, placing creative and caring work at the center of our culture This book is for everyone who wants to turn their vocation back into an avocation The author starts the book with the ambitious argument that a 20 hour work week would be possible if we were to eliminate all the BS jobs He writes about some data that about 40% of people mentioning that they have BS job but then he goes on to share some anecdotes from people who work as doormen, receptionist, promoter etc and nothing from the most common jobs, such as teachers, nurses, engineers and so on I fail to see the connection between getting rid of some unnecessary administrative job in a school and the teachers having to work less.His criticisms seem to be mostly against the foundations of the system, not against the way the system operates Through a utopic lens, the author believes that somehow an organization reducing costs by eliminating the unnecessary jobs would then go on to employ productive employees and reduce the total work hours The book felt like a poorly written Marxist critic of the evil capitalist system.Maybe if you feel like you are working in a BS job , you could get some cathartic joy from reading the book Otherwise, a complete waste of time. I really liked this book, its very funny in places while stating the truth, i feel everyone should read it, my husband and i have been saying for years that there are an awful lot of people doing or producing nothing while getting a good wage for it, there was talk about having to pay people not to work as the job market is drying up due to automation, some say we can t afford it and it would never happen, i have news for them, its already happening as this book will testify. John Maynard Keynes had great confidence that capitalism will improve not only the wealth but also the well being of all in society One of the specific predictions he made that, sadly, did not come true, was that by the end of the twentieth century, the major Western societies would have achieved the fifteen hour work week because technology would have alleviated hitherto long menial hours Why has that not happened and instead employees are working longer and longer hours Graeber blames the creation of what he calls BS jobs I had to shortened the word to pass censorship rules and the BSization of proper jobs Graeber s defines a BS job as a form of paid employment that is so completely pointless, unnecessary, or pernicious that even the employee cannot justify its existence even though, as part of the conditions of employment, the employee feels obliged to pretend that this is not the case He also says that Hell is a collection of individuals who are spending the bulk of their time working on a task they don t like and are not particularly good at He provides plenty of examples, cabinetmakers compelled to fry fish is one of them There is the story of a corporate lawyer who went on to become a happy singer in an indie rock band when he became disillusioned with his job as a corporate lawyer He had taken the default choice of many directionless folk law school but has found his job as a lawyer to be utterly meaningless, contributed nothing to the world, and, in his own estimation, should not really exist Some such BS jobs are so pointless that no one notices even if the employee vanishes One case involved a Spanish civil servant who skipped work for six years to study philosophy and became an expert in Spinoza before he was found out In another case, an employee had been sitting at his desk, dead for four days before his colleagues realised that he had died BS jobs can also be defined by the scope of work People who are employed in jobs that exist primarily to make someone else look or feel important are known as flunkies Doormen are examples in this category There are also goons who exist only because people employ them soldiers, for example and duct tapers who are employed to help one part of an organisation communicate with another in the same organisation In addition to financial consultancy, middle management is where one might find BS jobs aplenty A sign that you have a job like this is when you are designated to provide strategic leadership This is what Graeber has to say in middle management in academia Now, those of us toiling in the academic mills who still like to think of ourselves as teachers and scholars before all else have come to fear the word strategic Strategic statement or even worse, strategic vision documents instil a particular terror, since these are the primary means by which corporate management techniques setting up quantifiable methods for assessing performance, forcing teachers and scholars to spend and of their time assessing and justifying what they do and less and less time actually doing it are insinuated into academic life Graeber interviewed employees from various sectors From one he quoted, in banking, obviously the entire sector adds no value and is therefore BS Then there is the Human Resources Department that sets up intranet and instruct employees to make it into a kind of internal community , like Facebook They set it up nobody uses it So they then started to try and bully everyone into using it Then they tried to entice people in by having HR post a load of touchy feely crap or people writing internal blogs that nobody cared about Graeber argues that the rise of such jobs was not due to economic factors but political and moral ones He discusses how jobs can truly have value, and how exactly can value be measured What is clear that we must resist The pressure to value ourselves and others on the basis of how hard we work at something we d rather not be doing if you re not destroying your mind and body via paid work you re not living right The last part of the book is devoted to answering the question, How have so many humans reached the point where they accept that even miserable, unnecessary work is actually superior to no work at all From there Graeber discusses the modern culture of managerial feudalism and the resentment it generates, yet is itself oblivious to it If Graeber is right that this is not an economic problem but a political and moral one, then the solution cannot be economic either Unfortunately, Graeber is loath to make policy recommendations That keeps us then, in utter suspense unless workers revolt. Ungef hr die H lfte des Buches beschreibt das Ph nomen von sinnlosen Jobs Ja, die gibt esauch in Deutschland Einiges ber solche Jobs ist bereits von Dilbert bekannt.David Graeber geht jedoch weiter und bietet eine gewisse Systematisierung.Was die Ursachen und Handlungsempfehlungen angeht, bin ich nicht immer von denErkl rungen des Autors berzeugt David Graeber versucht m glichst komplizierteTheorien zu entwickeln, wo eine profane und einfache Erkl rung reichen w rde.Erg nzung Viele Rezensenten hier und auf bem ngeln, dass das Buch wenig an Beweisen bietet.Zuerst einmal Es ist keine wissenschaftliche Abhandlung Das Buch ist schon polemisch geschrieben Das Buch ist auch nicht in einem wissenschaftlichen Verlag erschienen Wer eine stringente wissenschaftliche Arbeit lesen m chte, braucht dieses Buch nicht zu kaufen.Zweitens ist das Buch selbstverst ndlich auch ein Angriff auf die vorherrschende Volkswirtschaftslehre, die immer noch von effizienten M rkten spricht Wer sich da herausgefordert und angegriffen f llt, wird immer mehr Beweise fordern. Gutes Buch Spannende Ideen und gut recherchiert Allerdings sehr kontrover.